Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, getting a 95.4 score against 87.1. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra design is older, just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little sharper display than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has much worse brightness, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a little larger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 512 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a little better battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light images and video and a tinier back camera sensor capturing lower quality photos, it also counts with a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a much better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.