Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Moto G 5G, having a overall score of 95.4 against 81.5. Both phones in this review work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and Moto G 5G has Android 10. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer and somewhat thinner device than Moto G 5G, although it's a little heavier.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features an incredibly better looking display than Moto G 5G, because it has a quite larger screen, a greater number of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little better performance than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
Moto G 5G counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much better photographs and videos than Moto G 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way better video resolution and a lot more MP camera in the back.
Motorola Moto G 5G and Galaxy S22 Ultra count with extremely similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.