Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.28 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the Moto G Power (2021)'s 76.5 overall score. Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is just a little heavier than Moto G Power (2021), it's just a bit thinner and newer. Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a bit better performance than Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better looking screen than Moto G Power (2021), because it has a bit bigger display, a way higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a lot greater pixels number per screen inch. The Motorola Moto G Power (2021) counts with a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much better photographs and videos than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a much more mega pixels back facing camera, a way larger sensor shooting much higher quality photographs and videos and a way better video resolution.
The Moto G Power (2021) and Galaxy S22 Ultra count with really similar battery durations.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G Power (2021). So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy S22 Ultra, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto G Power (2021), giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.