Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than Moto G Stylus (2021), with a 95.4 score against 79.3. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body has the same thickness than the Moto G Stylus (2021), but it is just a bit heavier. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much more vibrant display than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit better processing unit than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra captures way better photos and videos than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images, it also counts with a way better 108 MP resolution camera and a lot higher video resolution.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with better battery duration than Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021). So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy S22 Ultra, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.