Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-04-15 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G100, having a global score of 95.4 against 88.9. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version while Motorola Moto G100 has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is newer and just a little thinner, but just a bit heavier than Motorola Moto G100.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better looking screen than Moto G100, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a bit greater pixels number in each inch in the screen and a little bigger display. The Motorola Moto G100 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both have a 8 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy S22 Ultra takes better pictures and videos than Moto G100, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting images or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a camera with a much better resolution, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a way larger camera sensor capturing much better quality photographs and videos.
The Moto G100 features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Moto G100 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Moto G100's battery duration is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.