Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, getting a overall score of 95.4 against 86.2. These devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Motorola Moto G200 5G has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra construction has the same thickness than Motorola Moto G200 5G, but it's heavier.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has an incredibly better screen than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px. The Moto G200 5G features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 8 GB RAM.
Galaxy S22 Ultra and Moto G200 5G count with really similar memory capacity for apps and games, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Moto G200 5G and Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra both feature incredibly similar battery durations. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better camera than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have a 108 megapixels back camera, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a larger camera aperture to capture better photos in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.