Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-12-06 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Baby Blue and Mineral Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than Moto G31, with a 95.4 score against 77. Even though Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better cellphone than the Moto G31, it must be noted that it's also just a little bit thicker and way heavier. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Moto G31 has Android 11, offering some extra features and performance improvements.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto G31, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better looking display than Moto G31, because it has a bit larger display, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a just a little more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot better camera than Motorola Moto G31, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera and a much better video quality. The Moto G31 counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Moto G31 counts with a battery life that is just as good as the battery lifetime in Galaxy S22 Ultra.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.