Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-12-20 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is much better than Motorola Moto G51 5G's 77.8 general score. The Galaxy S22 Ultra body is a bit heavier but a little thinner than the Motorola Moto G51 5G, and they were released with only 2 months difference. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version while Motorola Moto G51 5G has Android 11 version, so it gives you a couple additional features and optimized performance.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much sharper screen than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a better pixels density. The Moto G51 5G counts with more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a back facing camera with a way better resolution and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Moto G51 5G's battery lifetime is just as good as Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.