Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-04-27 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the Moto G60, with a 95.4 score against 79.5. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is newer and somewhat thinner, but a little heavier than Moto G60. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and Moto G60 has Android 11, giving some extra features.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features an incredibly better display than Motorola Moto G60, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px. The Moto G60 has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G60, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior camera than Motorola Moto G60, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger diafragm aperture and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Moto G60 counts with improved battery life than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.