Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | -- |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the Motorola Moto G60s, getting a overall score of 95.4 against 79.9. Both phones we compare here work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version and Motorola Moto G60s has Android 11 version, so it offers some additional features and performance improvements. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a a little thinner but just a bit heavier cellphone than Motorola Moto G60s.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better looking display than Moto G60s, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher pixel count per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
Moto G60s features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G60s also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra and the Moto G60s have very similar batteries performance.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes way better photos and videos than Moto G60s, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photos and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a much better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.