Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is better than Moto G71 5G's general score of 82.9. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Moto G71 5G has Android 11 version, so it gives you a couple additional features. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a heavier and just a bit thicker phone than the Moto G71 5G.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better looking screen than Motorola Moto G71 5G, because it has a little bit larger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a little bit greater pixel density.
The Moto G71 5G's storage to store more games and applications is very similar to Galaxy S22 Ultra's one, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot better resolution back facing camera and a way higher video quality.
Moto G71 5G's battery duration is very similar to Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.