Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-08-28 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is way better than Motorola Moto G9 Play's 76.7 score. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version and Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10 version, so it provides lots of additional features. The Galaxy S22 Ultra design is newer and a little thinner, but heavier than Motorola Moto G9 Play.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little better performance than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with an incredibly better screen than Moto G9 Play, because it has a quite larger screen, a much higher pixel quantity per inch of display and a way better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
The Moto G9 Play has a better memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots way better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photos, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot larger camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Moto G9 Play counts with a battery lifetime that is very similar to Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.