Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2022-02-25 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, with a 95.4 score against 75.8. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has older 13 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a a lot newer phone than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it's thicker and way heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit more powerful processor than Moto Z Force, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels amount per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3088.
Moto Z Force counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a camera in the back with a way better 108 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a really longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto Z Force. If you want to save some money, you can get the Motorola Moto Z Force, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.