Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, having a global score of 95.4 against 76.4. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a noticeably newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, but it's a lot heavier and thicker. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a sharper screen than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a quite lower pixel quantity in each inch of screen, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot better camera than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot higher video definition and a camera in the back with a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.