Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a score of 95.4 against 77.4. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is noticeably newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition's, although it is much heavier and much thicker. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a brighter display than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a little worse display density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3088.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a processor that is very similar to the processor in Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a much bigger camera sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality, a back camera with a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and video.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a superior battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S22 Ultra is way more expensive than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.