Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Moto Z2 Play, having a score of 95.4 against 77.4. Even though Galaxy S22 Ultra is extremely newer than Moto Z2 Play, it's notably heavier and way thicker. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little faster CPU than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better looking display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a bigger screen and a just a bit greater pixel number in each inch in the display. Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots way better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
The Moto Z2 Play counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better battery duration than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z2 Play. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto Z2 Play, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.