Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2022-02-25 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Moto Z3, with a 95.4 score against 77.6. Even though Galaxy S22 Ultra is noticeably newer than Moto Z3, it's a lot thicker and a lot heavier. These devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the older 13 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better display than Moto Z3, because it has a quite better count of pixels per inch of display, a little bit bigger display and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution. The Moto Z3 counts with a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra and the Motorola Moto Z3 both feature incredibly similar processors, and although the Motorola Moto Z3 has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light captures, a lot higher resolution camera in the back, a much higher video quality and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z3. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Moto Z3, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.