Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play's overall score of 76.3. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is noticeably newer than Motorola Moto Z3 Play's, although it's extremely thicker and way heavier. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit better CPU than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better looking screen than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a bit bigger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a bit greater screen pixels density. The Moto Z3 Play has a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots greater videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a way larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more money than Moto Z3 Play, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.