Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Oxford blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is much better than Motorola One 5G's score of 84.6. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a a little heavier device than Motorola One 5G, but they have the same thickness. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot better looking display than Motorola One 5G, because it has a bit larger screen, a little more pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola One 5G features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola One 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola One 5G and Galaxy S22 Ultra have really similar battery performance. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking pictures and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photographs, a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a lot higher video definition.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One 5G. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Motorola One 5G, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.