Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Motorola One 5G Ace, having a score of 95.4 against 81.6. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is newer and thinner than the Motorola One 5G Ace's, but it is a little heavier. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much sharper display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution, a little bigger display and a higher pixels quantity per inch of screen. The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Motorola One 5G Ace's battery lifetime is very similar to Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery lifetime. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better camera than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One 5G Ace. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola One 5G Ace, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.