Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the Motorola One Action's global score of 78.5. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a noticeably newer and just a bit thinner device than Motorola One Action, but it is a lot heavier. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit better performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot better display than Motorola One Action, because it has a little higher display pixel density, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a quite larger display. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots greater photographs and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot higher video definition and a lot more mega pixels camera.
Motorola One Action counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola One Action also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much longer battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola One Action. If you want to save some money, you can get Motorola One Action, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.