Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is just a bit better than Motorola razr (2020), having a global score of 95.4 against 87. Although the Galaxy S22 Ultra is newer than Motorola razr (2020), it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version while Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11 version, so it gives you a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a quite larger screen, a better amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3088. The Motorola razr (2020) has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) features a little bit better performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior camera than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a way larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs, a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much longer battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 79% bigger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Galaxy S22 Ultra is also cheaper than the Motorola razr (2020), which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.