Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 12 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than Motorola razr (2022), getting a score of 95.4 against 81.1. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version and Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12, so it provides the user some additional features and performance enhancements. Despite being the best cellphone in this review, it must be noted that it is also somewhat thicker and heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better looking screen than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, more pixels per inch in the screen and a bit bigger screen. Motorola razr (2022) has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes way better photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a bigger aperture to take better photography and video in low light environments, a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra and the Motorola razr (2022) have quite similar storage to install applications and games, both of them have the same internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 43% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.