Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 15 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | -- |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPO |
| 501 pixels per inch | -- |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), with a general score of 95.4 against 79.2. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has much worse brightness and a little bit smaller screen.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures better photos and videos than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has lower 24 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also counts with a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.