Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the Nokia XR20, getting a 95.4 score against 80.8. The Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Nokia XR20, even when they were only released 7 months apart. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Nokia XR20 has Android 11, providing you a couple additional features.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a sharper display than Nokia XR20, because it has a lot brighter display, a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution, a greater pixels density and a quite larger screen. The Nokia XR20 counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Nokia XR20 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit more powerful processing unit than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little longer battery duration than Nokia XR20, because it has an 8 percent more battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots way better photographs and videos than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot more expensive than the Nokia XR20, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.