Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having a 95.4 score against 75.8. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer and just a little bit thinner device than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it is also a little heavier. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a quite bigger screen and more pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a superior camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality pictures and videos and better video frame rates.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a battery life that is very similar to the battery performance in Galaxy S22 Ultra.
Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.