Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is way better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's overall score of 76.2. Even though the Galaxy S22 Ultra is just a bit heavier than nubia Red Magic 5S, it's just a bit thinner and newer. Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a greater display density, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a way brighter display and a quite bigger display.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much clearer photographs and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same video definition, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot larger camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos, a camera with a much higher 108 megapixels resolution and faster 24 frames per second video frame rates.
The nubia Red Magic 5S's memory for games and applications is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra one, both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features just a bit longer battery duration than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
Galaxy S22 Ultra is way more expensive than nubia Red Magic 5S, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.