Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the OPPO Find X2, getting a 95.4 score against 79.7. Both phones in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and OPPO Find X2 has Android 10 version. The Galaxy S22 Ultra body is newer, but thicker and heavier than OPPO Find X2.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little bit better looking screen than OPPO Find X2, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a just a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and way more screen brightness. OPPO Find X2 features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a better camera than OPPO Find X2, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a way better video definition.
OPPO Find X2 features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with superior battery performance than OPPO Find X2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.