Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, having a score of 95.4 against 83.1. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, but it's a little heavier. Both devices we compare here have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides the user a lot of extra features.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit better display than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display and a little lower resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, it also counts with way more screen brightness and a little bit larger screen.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much clearer photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot better video resolution, a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features greater battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4260mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.