Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | -- |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, with a overall score of 95.4 against 77. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version and OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11 version, providing some additional features and performance enhancements. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a notably heavier and somewhat thicker phone than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a brighter display than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because it has a much brighter display, a quite bigger display, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a little better pixel amount in each display inch. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a really longer battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Galaxy S22 Ultra takes a lot better videos and photos than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking photos or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a camera with a way better resolution and a way higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.