Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-12-03 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, with a score of 95.4 against 82.1. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has Android 12 version, so it provides the user a couple additional features and enhanced performance. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a somewhat heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, but they are 0.35inches thick.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a much greater pixels density, a way better 1440 x 3088px resolution and a bit bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a very superior camera than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a back camera with much more MP.
The Galaxy A13 5G has a battery performance that is just as good as Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.