Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's 77.4 overall score. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14 version. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is an older, just a bit thicker and heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a very superior processing power than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A15 5G, because it has a higher screen pixels density, a really brighter display, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a quite larger screen.
Galaxy A15 5G features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G and Galaxy S22 Ultra have very similar battery durations.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A15 5G. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy S22 Ultra, else you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A15 5G, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.