Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-02-25 | -- |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than the Galaxy A16 5G, with a score of 95.4 against 76.2. Despite being the best in this review, the Galaxy S22 Ultra is a somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier device than Galaxy A16 5G. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the older 13 version while Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because it has much more brightness, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, more pixels per screen inch and a little larger screen.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better camera than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much more megapixels camera. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A16 5G's battery lifetime is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra one.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A16 5G. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A16 5G, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.