Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | TFT |
| 501 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy A20s, with a 95.4 score against 77. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A20s has Android 11 version, so it provides you some additional features and optimized performance. The Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is way newer than Samsung Galaxy A20s's, although it's heavier and thicker.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much sharper screen than Galaxy A20s, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, a much higher display pixel density and a little bit larger screen. Galaxy A20s counts with a bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera with lot more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features improved battery life than Galaxy A20s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.