Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-06-29 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy A21, with a 95.4 score against 76.1. These devices include Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A21 has Android 10, providing a lot of extra features and a performance increase. The Galaxy S22 Ultra body is newer, but just a little thicker and heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A21.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A21, because it has a little bit larger screen, a much better amount of pixels per inch of display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088px. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little bit better storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A21, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A21, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 5 GB more RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy A21, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much higher 108 MP resolution back facing camera, a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A21, because it has a 25% larger battery size.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A21, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A21. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy S22 Ultra, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A21, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.