Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the Galaxy A25 5G, with a score of 95.4 against 79.9. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better phone than Galaxy A25 5G, we must highlight that it's also older, heavier and just a little bit thicker.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because it has a little bit bigger display, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a way brighter display and a greater screen density. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A25 5G also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's battery lifetime is just as good as the battery life in Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much higher resolution back camera, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a way bigger camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.