Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than Galaxy A30, having a general score of 95.4 against 79.6. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a noticeably newer phone than Galaxy A30, although it's way heavier and thicker. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a bit higher screen density and a little bit larger display.
Galaxy A30 features a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way bigger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality, a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera in the back with a lot higher 108 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.