Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Galaxy A30s, having a general score of 95.4 against 79.8. Even though Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much newer than Galaxy A30s, it's somewhat thicker and a lot heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Galaxy A30s has Android 11 version, providing some nice extra features and improved performance.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot better display than Galaxy A30s, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a quite bigger display and a way greater number of pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy A30s has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A30s also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing images or video in low light environments, it also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.