Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A31, getting a global score of 95.4 against 81.3. The Galaxy S22 Ultra design is newer, but just a little thicker and heavier than Samsung Galaxy A31. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A31 has Android 10, so it provides you some additional features and a performance increase.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A31, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bigger display and a just a little greater pixels number per inch of screen. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A31 features a better storage for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better camera than Galaxy A31, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a back-facing camera with a much better 108 megapixels resolution, a lot larger sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality and a larger diafragm aperture.
Galaxy A31 has a battery duration that's just as good as Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.