Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 13 |
| 2022-02-25 | -- |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 8.08 ounces | -- |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than Samsung Galaxy A34, having a 95.4 score against 82.9. Both of these phones have the same Android 13 OS. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has a little larger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a higher quantity of pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A34, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A34 has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy A34 counts with a battery life that is just as good as Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery duration. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior camera than Galaxy A34, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much better 108 MP resolution back facing camera and a much larger sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.