Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than Galaxy A35 5G, having a overall score of 95.4 against 79.4. These phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has older 13 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14. Although it's the best phone in our current comparison, it must be noted that it's also a incredibly older, a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier phone.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a quite bigger display, a lot brighter screen, more pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G and Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra feature very similar storage to store more apps and games, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better performance than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much better video definition and a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy A35 5G's battery duration is just as good as Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.