Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Samsung Galaxy A40, getting a 95.4 score against 79.6. Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction is much newer, but extremely heavier and somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A40. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A40 has Android 11 version.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A40, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has a larger screen, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a little higher pixels amount in each screen inch.
Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A40, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, it also counts with a lot better 108 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a way larger camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Galaxy A40 features more storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better battery duration than Galaxy A40, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.