Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than Samsung Galaxy A41, having a 95.4 score against 81.7. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A41 has Android 11 version, so it counts with lots of additional features. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is newer, but heavier and thicker than Samsung Galaxy A41.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bigger screen and a just a little greater pixels count in each screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a lot bigger sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a larger diafragm aperture to take better images in low light situations.
The Galaxy A41 features a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.