Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A52 5G's 91.3 score. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is newer than Galaxy A52 5G's, but it's just a little thicker and heavier. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and Galaxy A52 5G has Android 12 version, so it gives a lot of extra features and performance improvements.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better looking screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a just a little better quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a bit larger display and a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A52 5G also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a camera with way more megapixels, a much bigger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality photographs and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.