Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A52s, getting a overall score of 95.4 against 91.1. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A52s has Android 11 version. Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A52s.
Galaxy A52s and Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra have very similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy A52s has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot better screen than Galaxy A52s, because it has a quite larger display, a bit better pixels count in each inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way larger camera sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality, a way more megapixels back camera and a way better video definition.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.