Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the Galaxy A8 (2018)'s 79.2 global score. Although the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot newer than Galaxy A8 (2018), it's a bit thicker and notably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a little more pixels per screen inch, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a larger screen. The Galaxy A8 (2018) counts with a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 67 percent bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes greater photos and videos than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for taking photos and videos in low light environments, it also counts with a much more megapixels camera in the back and a way higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.