Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is much better than Galaxy A9 (2018)'s 85.2 overall score. Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much newer than Galaxy A9 (2018), it is much heavier and somewhat thicker. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a lot better screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has more pixels per inch in the display, a bit larger display and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a back camera with way more MP, a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much higher video resolution.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.