Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2022-02-25 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than Galaxy C5, with a 95.4 score against 76.4. Although the Galaxy S22 Ultra is extremely newer than Galaxy C5, it's notably thicker and much heavier. Both phones we compare here come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has older 13 version while Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little faster CPU than Galaxy C5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a lot larger screen, a little greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3088.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy C5, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures and videos, a camera with much more mega pixels and a way higher video definition. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy C5, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy C5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.