Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy F41's global score of 85.2. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a heavier device than the Samsung Galaxy F41, but both have the same thickness. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy F41 has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy F41, because it has a bit larger screen, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, much more brightness and a bit greater pixel density. Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a processing unit that is just as good as the Galaxy S22 Ultra one, and although the Samsung Galaxy F41 has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy F41 counts with a bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much larger camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures, a much better video definition and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy F41 has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a 20% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.