Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a bit better than the Galaxy F62, having a 95.4 score against 88.1. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is newer and a bit thinner than Galaxy F62's, although it's just a little bit heavier. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version while Galaxy F62 has Android 11.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little faster processor than Galaxy F62, because it has more CPU cores and 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a better looking screen than Galaxy F62, because it has a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a quite bigger screen, much more brightness and a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a superior camera than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a way bigger sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a 40 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.